Despite calls for greater transparency in the distribution of posts, and the need for unions to education designations are made for competitions, another complaint brought to the fore the lack of compliance State. "They tried to ascribe to an agent 'a finger', without the relevant competition," complained AIM guild secretary Villa Paranacito subsidiary of the Professional Association of Teachers of Entre Rios (Agmer), José Luis Regalado.
In dialogue with the Agency, Regalado said that "the rejection of the school governing Technical Education No. 1 'Augusto Widmann' of Villa Paranacito, stopped the proposal made by the department Islands senator, Caesar Melchiori, to ascribe the agent Javier Urbanowsky, which takes as Personal Assistant Services (Ordinance) in the establishment and Teacher Education Practice (MEP) in the workshops of the institution. "
Regalado said that "fortunately, the situation did not succeed because it would have been a shame, because the MEP charges are competitive and not handpicked. "
leader recalled that the last time, the demands on the State Agmer "comply with the Statute of the Teaching and make competitions with the utmost rigor. But while the president of the General Council of Education (CGE), Graciela Bar, ensures that the adjustment work performed 'exhaustive analysis of each of the situations to fill vacancies' and made 'competitions with the utmost rigor' In many cases, this assumption is not met, despite the claim of teacher unions, complained. Another antecedent
Last week, AIM published a similar case . The two children of the School Department director of the department Tala, Andres Honorio Casaretto, went to the plant benefit by resolution 0825 of the CGE, despite not having paid any contest. Full read here
Many of us wanted to believe that the death of Mariano F. had been perpetrated against the government, not by delegates of the same. Many insist, however, the opposite idea: if you pacts with the worst villain of unionism, if you give them financial support, if you do business with them, if encouraged to bear against the left, if I closed the legal recognition opposition groups, if it frees up police areas when it comes to facing the "enemy", if you smile when you see a speech "anti-left" within unionism, if you give jobs to mob thugs; then, do not tell me you're a victim when you're a mastermind (material no, because you assume the responsibility, but the outsource of parsley, obviously).
But I look back over the images. These images appear shortly after the death of Mariano F., when, one would expect, should be trying to hide, so they do not really notice what they do, shows they do not really care about anything in terms of reputation: No shame, no limits (perhaps death) when it comes to facing the dissident, total then nothing happens. To this the government called, proudly "No repression of social protest."
But I look back over the images, incomprehensible, and therefore also fascinating, because they would become unimaginable, just after the death of Mariano F. They speak of a deep conviction of impunity. They reaffirm that violence against trade union left (and against union opposition groups in general) responds to structural arrangements (common affairs, electoral pacts, political alliances). This is a systematic plan, not the crazy error Pedraza; of Zanola crazy, the crazy Moyano. Posted in Act S. XXI
0 comments:
Post a Comment